Evaluating Evidence in Court
by Nicola
(Scotland, UK)
Photo Credit: Vitualis
What are the other methods of evaluating evidence in court other than:
The likelihood ratio
The bayes theroem
Match probability
Deens appeal
Conditional probabilities
Transposed conditional
Prosecutor/defendant fallacy
Balding size
Prior and posterior odds
Fequentist approach
Intiutive process
Kindship testing
And are these even ways of evaluating evidence? Thanks